25 Şubat 2013 Pazartesi

Review: Farmer's Pride Pickled Bologna

To contact us Click HERE
Late last week, I got a heads-up from Steve Wood, who writes Connecticut Museum Quest, a top-notch Connecticut blog that is about so much more than just museums. He alerted me to a new product at Ocean State Job Lot: Farmer's Pride Snack Bologna (which just so happened to be featured in OSJL's "internet coupon" selection.)
Holy shit, pickled bologna! How could I resist?
Lynnafred found the jars at our local Ocean State. She picked one up - it was the size of a largish peanut butter jar - and peered at the "bologna" within: they were in the form of huge, fat Vienna sausages (and according to the ingredient panel, they're composed of pretty much the same stuff.) The jars were plastic and sealed with soft plastic lids, and as Lynnafred looked through the brine at the bologna she said, "Eww. These are grey. Are they supposed to look like that?" After looking at a dozen other jars, and finding all of them containing somewhat greyish weiners sealed within, we concluded that the answer was probably Yes, they are supposed to look like that. The coupon said that there was a limit of 12 jars per family, but we curbed our enthusiasm and held ourselves to the purchase of a single jar which, at $1.20, seemed to be a fair price.

Let me start the actual review by saying that I can not believe that Farmer's Pride pickled bologna is a regularly-produced consumer good. Every single component of this product screams "DISPOSE OF CHEAP SHIT!!"  The jars are flimsy plastic, the lids seem to be made of the same quality plastic as imported dollar-store toys from China, the labels look like they were run off on a laser printer. Most of the jars at the store had sticky label residue clinging to the non-labeled areas, telling me that these snacks were probably rejected by the company which originally contracted them, leading the manufacturer to hastily peel the original label and rebrand them for the "remainder market" (i.e. dollar stores and job lot joints like OSJL.) And then, of course, there is the actual bologna itself:

That is one nasty-ass piece of tubesteak right there. Check out the gradations of coloring, from a kind of brownish-grey at the ends to rather pinkish in the middle. I swear I used no filtering or image manipulation to change those colors - that is exactly how they come out of the jar. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to capture the true beauty of the grey lines that run from tip to tip on the wieners, especially where the meat was in contact with the sides of the jar. These things are truly ghastly to look at.

At least when we cut into the wiener we found that the grey color doesn't go all the way through - once you get a little way into the surface, everything kind of turns pink again. I guess that means that they're okay to eat. Honestly, eyeballs are all we have to go by for safety, because there are absolutely no olfactory cues here. No scent of spices, no aroma of meat - nothing at all except the pungency of strong vinegar stabbing at our nostrils like fleets of aromatic daggers. The manufacturer (Monogram Meat Snacks LLC, USDA EST 795) could not possibly have made the brine any more unpleasantly sharp.

And the wieners are just as unpleasant to eat as they are to look at. The texture is firm and smooth, but there is little flavor beyond the powerful vinegar brine, which is so acidic that it actually produces a burning sensation in the mouth and throat. And - worst of all to me - the meat leaves a disgusting tallowy film coating the mouth and tongue. These things are grossly misnamed - they should be called "Farmer's Shame."

As with so many other oddball snacks we've tried over the years, Farmer's Pride Snack Bologna proved to be pretty popular with the dogs, though I didn't dare give them all they wanted due to the acidity of the pickle (the last thing I want to do is spend an afternoon scrubbing dog puke out of the dining room rug.)

So there you have it. Cheap, shitty, only marginally edible, and obviously close to the end of its shelf life - Look for 'em at a dollar store near you - and pass them up in favor of almost anything else you find.




.

Out of the Can: Senora Verde's Beef Tamales

To contact us Click HERE

The pale- and incredibly foul-looking cylinders of evil pictured above are the contents of a can of Senora Verde Beef Tamales,  directly as emptied onto a paper plate. Some of them retained their paper sleeves as the can was tipped, others slipped from them like vile giant larvae shedding their outgrown skin. They were supposedly packed in "sauce," but that proved to be merely a watery tomato-flavored bile with a thick film of bright red grease floating on top. The "sauce" was easily disposed of, but globs of the grease stuck sort of randomly to everything else (including the plate, my fingers, and the walls of the microwave when I heated up this mess at work.)
Fast and cheap beef tamales don't have to be bad. I've picked up packages of them at the dollar store that were pretty decent. But these...things...were hideous.
Despite the illustration on the label showing a thick meaty center surrounded by a layer of corn, the tamales that actually writhed from the can were much more heavily maize-based. It was difficult to tell exactly where the cornmeal stopped and the meat began, but it was immediately apparent when I cut through the center of one that the beef filling was little more than a thin line running down the middle of each flaccid cornwobble. 
Sometimes I get a product that looks terrible, but then redeems itself with an enjoyable flavor. Not so with these tamales. Eating them only made the experience worse. The texture was disgusting - slippery and about as resilient as melty gelatine - and the greasy globs that clung to everything gave a tallowy coating to the roof of my mouth. The tallow carried through in the flavor, but there were also backnotes of rancid corn and slightly "off" canner-grade beef with the overall sourness of tomato sauce that has just started to go bad.  I managed to eat two or three bites before tipping the whole pile of shit into the bin, which is two or three bites more than anyone should ever have to eat of these goddamn yellow turds.


.

REVIEW: Mendelsohn's Frozen Lasagna

To contact us Click HERE
Single-serve frozen lasagna is one of my favorite lunches, and I'm always looking for new brands to try. So naturally, I grabbed a couple of boxes of Mendelsohn's Lasagna when I found it at The Barn in Greenfield MA.
This is a very simple lasagna - four layers of noodles each separated by a miniscule sprinkling of mozzarella cheese and tomato sauce, topped with a generous portion of more mozzarella, and not a bit of ricotta cheese to be found anywhere.
So basically., this "lasagna" is actually just pasta and cheese with some sauce.  And bad sauce it is, with so much sugar it's like eating candied pasta. Too bad, really, because despite the other shortcomings, I would be inclined to buy Mendelsohn's Lasagna again if it weren't for that awful tomato syrup.
On the positive side, it's the only frozen lasagna I've found which is certified Kosher. I guess you should consider that a warning - if you're keeping Kosher and you're relying on Mendelsohn's Lasagna for lunchtime deliciousness you will find only disappointment.

REVIEW: McDonald's New CBO (Cheddar Bacon Onion) Sandwiches

To contact us Click HERE
A strange thing happened over the weekend: Maryanne and I were out wandering in the car at lunchtime, and found ourselves looking for a quick bite to eat at the very moment that a McDonald's appeared on the road ahead.
Now, you guys all know how much I like McDonald's breakfast and bakery offerings. But you also know I am somewhat less-than-enthusiastic about their burgers. Maryanne kind of half-heartedly said, "There's a McDonald's up on the right," and I think I really surprised her when I replied, "Cool. Let's try out the new CBOs they introduced last week."
We got two sandwiches - one made with crispy chicken, and the other made on an Angus Third Pounder - and cut them in half so we could each try both sandwiches, and added a large fries to share and large coffees.

Out of the two sandwiches, the Crispy Chicken CBO was hands-down our favorite. The cheese and bacon were worthy complements to the chicken patty, and the caramelized onion brought a welcome touch of sweetness to counterbalance the salty bacon (and salty chicken coating.) It reminded us (favorably) of KFC's Double Down, but on a roll.

The Angus Third Pounder CBO was somewhat less successful. For one thing, the patty is far too dry. And because bacon-cheeseburgers have become a fairly standard offering for many a fast-food chain, finding one at McDonald's just isn't that special, even if there is caramelized onions sprinkled atop the patty. (C'mon, there's already an Angus Bacon & Cheese burger on the menu which is almost identical to the CBO.) And though the beef version of the CBO is larger than the chicken, we found it less satisfying because of its ordinariness. When we were done eating, both of wished we'd ordered our own Crispy Chicken CBOs and left the beef ones behind.

A couple of other notes about the ingredients:

  • McDonald's bacon is decent - better than the bacon served on sandwiches at most other chains (I'm lookin' at you, Wendy) but it would be even better if they used thick-sliced bacon instead of standard. 
  • I can't figure out what is so special about their "white cheddar" cheese since it tastes exactly like the orange cheddar that McDonald's uses on every other burger. 
  • The so-called "creamy mustard sauce" is so bland that it might as well be generic Ranch Dressing straight from a supermarket bottle.
My recommendation: Check out the Crispy Chicken CBO (or the Grilled Chicken CBO, for a slightly different take on it) and forget the Angus variety.

.

Review: Dominique's Snapper Turtle Soup

To contact us Click HERE
My only previous experience with turtle soup was the poem in Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland:

Beautiful Soup, so rich and green, 
Waiting in a hot tureen! 
Who for such dainties would not stoop? 
Soup of the evening, beautiful Soup! 
Soup of the evening, beautiful Soup!

So, you can see that I'm totally unqualified to review this stuff in comparison to any other canned or homemade turtle soup (not that that's ever stopped me from reviewing anything else I've found on a grocery store shelf.)
Anyway, as a total Snapper Turtle Soup N00b, I had no idea what to expect. I read the ingredient panel and found stuff like beef stock, celery, carrots, wine, and snapper turtle meat and figured it couldn't be all that bad. So I gambled a couple of bucks and bought a can to give it a try.
Dominique's Snapper Turtle Soup is condensed, so it requires the addition of one can-measure of water before heating. I opened up the can and poured the soup out into a saucepan to find a thick, gelatinous glob the consistency of slightly warming Jell-O, which dropped into the pan with a wet slap. I added the canful of water and stirred with little effect - the brown glue just didn't want to combine with the water. Eventually, I was able to stir it together and put it over the fire. I heated and stirred, but the soup never thinned out. (I've found out since then that snapper turtle soup is supposed to be thick like a gravy, so I guess that's the way it was actually intended to be.)

Mon dieu.
With the soup heated up and ready to eat, I sat down to try it out. It was, in a word, disgusting.

It was thicker than gravy, brown and viscous, swimming with tiny bits of what were probably vegetables, and small squares of spongy, flavorless meat which I think was supposed to be turtle. The flavor was sickening - slightly sour, as though they used the cheapest industrial-cleaning-fluid-grade wine they could find. It took a concerted effort to eat more than the first couple spoonfuls, but it didn't take me long to just give up.

Personally, I would never buy this again. And if this is an example of what snapper turtle soup is like, I'd never order it out, either.

.

24 Şubat 2013 Pazar

It's Groundhog Day!

To contact us Click HERE
Do NOT trust what the groundhog says, because it says something different for every region that has its own groundhog.  The more southerly groundhogs ("General Beauregard" comes to mind) are always going to predict an early spring due to their latitude.  More northern groundhogs (like "Punxatawny Phil") are always going to predict 6 more weeks of winter.

Regardless of what a groundhog's shadow says, THE CALENDAR NEVER LIES!  If the calendar says spring isn't coming for another month or two, then that's the final word.

Boomers' Health Fails To Measure Up to Parents'

To contact us Click HERE
From HealthDay News.  Gosh, I wonder why...could it be the proliferation of processed foods, convenience foods, foods drowned in a sea of chemicals and toxins, and fed whatever happens to be cheapest while confined to the point of strangulation?  We worked so hard to achieve this processed life, and look what it's doing to us!  THIS is progress?


"The baby boom is turning out to be a health bust.

Despite growing up at a time of great innovation in health care, the 78 million people born in the United States between 1946 and 1964 aren't looking all that healthy today, according to a new study.


Medical advances have led to the longest life expectancy ever, but U.S. baby boomers have higher rates of chronic disease, more disability and lower self-rated health than did their parents at a comparable age.

The research may surprise many baby boomers, who have embraced activities such as running, fitness classes and backpacking in unprecedented numbers.

"There seems to be somewhat of a disconnect between the reputation of baby boomers for being healthy and what we see in increasing rates of diabetes, high blood pressure and obesity," said study author Dr. Dana King, a professor of family medicine at West Virginia University School of Medicine. "It's really discouraging that they're not the healthiest generation."


The study, published as a research letter Feb. 4 in JAMA Internal Medicine, compared data on people aged 46 to 64 in two time periods -- from 1988 to 1994 for the older generation, and from 2007 to 2010 for the baby boomers.

While 32 percent of their parents' generation described their health as "excellent," only about 13 percent of baby boomers did so.

Obesity was more common among baby boomers than their parents (39 percent versus 29 percent). In addition, 52 percent of boomers said they had no regular physical activity, while only 17 percent in their parents' generation reported inactivity.


There was one area of good news, however. Boomers have lower rates of heart attack and emphysema, and are less likely to smoke cigarettes, the study reported. King noted that the reduction in smoking -- from 28 percent of the population to 21 percent -- shows the value of conducting a concerted public health campaign. He said the nation needs to focus the same amount of effort now on obesity to discover truly effective solutions.

The findings didn't surprise some experts.

"Obesity seems to be the underlying cause of many of the health issues baby boomers are facing," said Nancy Copperman, a registered dietitian and director of public health initiatives at North Shore-LIJ Health System, in Great Neck, N.Y. "I wasn't surprised to see the data because we've seen the obesity epidemic over the past two to three decades really increase, and with that heart disease, diabetes and high blood pressure." 

The study tapped data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Factors used to compare the two generations included health status, functional and work disability, healthy lifestyle characteristics, and presence of chronic disease.


The baby boomer generation had a higher percentage of people with high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes and obesity than did their parents' generation.

Disability was defined conservatively, said King. "To be considered disabled you had to be walking only with an assistance device, such as a cane, or only able to climb up 10 steps, have trouble stooping down, or walking a quarter of a mile," he explained. Again, boomers consistently had a higher level of disability than their parents' generation.

So what was the previous generation doing right? "There was a huge difference in their typical amount of exercise," said King. "Fifty percent were getting moderate physical activity 12 times a month, while just 35 percent of baby boomers got that much exercise." 


 
The research also showed that medication use for high blood pressure was higher among baby boomers, and prescription drug use for high cholesterol was 10 times greater among the younger generation than among the previous generation. Of course, many of the medications boomers take were not widely available when their parents were of similar age.


Do boomers rely too much on medications to solve their health issues? "I'm concerned that has a great deal to do with the problem," said King. "The drugs are supposed to be used in addition to a healthy lifestyle, not instead of it." 

Baby boomers are definitely moving less than their parents did, said Copperman. "Our parents didn't have the conveniences we have. Now, often both parents are working and spending less time doing manual labor. Instead of mowing the lawn or cleaning the house, they might hire someone to do it," she noted.

But King said it's still not too late for baby boomers to get healthier. He said his previous research showed that it is possible to "turn back the clock" even in one's 50s and 60s."

The study in question has not been released in print yet, and Mama ain't payin' for access to a sneak peek.

Number of Americans With Alzheimer's May Triple By 2050

To contact us Click HERE
From HealthDay News.  With the proliferation into better eating and carb control, I'm thinking not.  Besides, the majority of Boomers will already be dead.


"The number of Americans afflicted with Alzheimer's disease could triple within the next 40 years if no progress is made against the disease, new projections show.

Reporting in the Feb. 6 online issue of the journal Neurology, researchers say that by 2050, nearly 14 million Americans could have Alzheimer's -- the most common form of dementia. That's close to triple the prevalence in 2010, when an estimated 4.7 million U.S. adults had the memory-robbing disease.


The new prediction is an update of a report published a decade ago -- which also projected a near-tripling in Alzheimer's disease in the next few decades.

So, not much has changed. "This is where we're headed if we don't make any progress in Alzheimer's research," said researcher Jennifer Weuve, an assistant professor at the Rush Institute for Healthy Aging in Chicago.

Unfortunately, she added, research into treating and delaying the disease has so far been "frustrating."

There are several drugs approved in the United States for slowing memory loss and other Alzheimer's symptoms -- brands like Aricept and Namenda. The medications work by affecting chemical messengers in the brain. But for many people, they either do not help or only work for a limited time.

Then there are the experimental "anti-amyloid" drugs, which target a protein that builds up and forms so-called plaques in the brains of people with Alzheimer's. But in studies so far, the medications have failed to help when given to people who already have moderate dementia symptoms.

Now, the hope is that they might work if given earlier in the game.

Research in the next several years could be pivotal, said Dr. P. Murali Doraiswamy, a psychiatry professor at Duke University Medical Center and an author of the book "The Alzheimer's Action Plan."


Three major clinical trials are starting this year, all looking at prevention in some way, Doraiswamy said. Two are testing drug treatment for people with gene mutations that cause inherited, early-onset Alzheimer's; the other involves older adults who have no dementia symptoms but do have amyloid deposits in their brains.

All of those studies are looking at anti-amyloid drugs.

Doraiswamy said that the risk is that researchers are "putting all their eggs in one basket" by focusing on amyloid-clearing drugs. The theory is that amyloid plaques are the root cause of dementia symptoms in Alzheimer's, but that's not a certainty.

Some other, smaller studies are testing other approaches, though, Doraiswamy said. One such trial is looking at whether supervised exercise can ward off or delay dementia in older adults with mild cognitive [mental] impairment -- less serious problems with memory and thinking that can eventually progress to Alzheimer's.

"If some of these trials succeed, we may be able to make a significant difference in the future prevalence of Alzheimer's," Doraiswamy said. "If they don't, we'll be back to the drawing board."

The latest findings are based on a long-term study of 10,800 older adults from Chicago who were evaluated for dementia; over 13 years, 402 were diagnosed with Alzheimer's. Weuve's team used U.S. Census data to extrapolate the findings to the whole population.

They estimate that, barring major research advances, 13.8 million Americans will have Alzheimer's in 2050 -- including 7 million people aged 85 or older.


It's thought that the brain damage in Alzheimer's begins a decade or more before symptoms emerge. There's also some evidence that the same risk factors for heart disease -- such as high blood pressure and diabetes -- might also be linked to Alzheimer's risk.

So, prevention may need to start early. "If we're going to make progress, we will probably have to focus on mid-life," Weuve said.

No one is sure, however, what the average person can do to prevent or delay Alzheimer's disease. A number of studies have linked certain lifestyle habits -- regular exercise, a healthy diet and staying mentally active -- to a lowered Alzheimer's risk. But it's not clear that those habits are the reason for the reduced risk.

"Right now, there is no magic bullet," Doraiswamy said. "But I would still encourage people to get regular exercise, to not smoke, to follow a healthy diet, like the Mediterranean diet." That diet is rich in fish, vegetables and fruit, whole grains and olive oil -- a source of "good" unsaturated fat.


According to the Alzheimer's Association, the United States spent about $200 billion in direct treatment costs for Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia in 2012. If no progress is made, that figure will top $1 trillion in 2050.

The good news is that there is now a national focus on Alzheimer's, said Maria Carrillo, vice president of medical and scientific relations for the Alzheimer's Association.

Last year, the Obama administration announced the creation of the National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease, which included funds for research, health care provider training and family caregiver support. It set a goal of finding effective treatment and prevention approaches by 2025.

"We're very hopeful," Carrillo said. But, she added, there needs to be continued "pressure" on government so that Alzheimer's is not forgotten. "This is an under-addressed crisis in the U.S.," she noted.

To help advance research, people with Alzheimer's and their families could also consider participating in clinical trials, Carrillo noted. "Many people don't even know that there are clinical trials, and that they're recruiting," she said."

At the risk of becoming a math extrapolation, it would be nice for someone to take low-carb eaters and test them, but alas--they probably have great trouble finding any "older adults", certainly ENOUGH older adults, who are low-carb eaters, to make a study with.  If they're sincerely interested in catching this thing early like they say, they'd be wise to drop down to the 40-50 year cohort, and seek out those who are fat-adapted.

I read an interesting book called The Brain Trust Program while in my search for information on what actually happens during a hot flash.  This book was written by an actual neurologist, so he knows a little something about Alzheimer's and how to prevent it. He's not some bean counter paid to extrapolate numbers in order to scare us into eating right and caring about ourselves.  He's not a headline-grabber.

This guy actually had a single solution for hot flashes, epilepsy, AND Alzheimer's:  get fat adapted!  He even explains why, and I've shared the explanation with you in my Menopause Musings--carbs broken down into sugars no longer reach the brain, and the brain must then rely on ketones for energy.  So much for the idea of Type 3 diabetes!  So much for the idea of the brain being flooded with sugar and becoming insulin resistant!  The brain is actually being starved to death, and is forced to eat itself looking for energy.

In children and young adults, this brain sugar shortage due to faulty sugar/hormone shuttles manifests itself as epilepsy.  In midlife, it shows up as hot flashes.  In old age, it appears as Alzheimer's.  These are signs of carb super-sensitivity that are going ignored by much of the populace--the kids may be getting the most beneficial treatment of all the cases of carb super-sensitivty.


We can stuff these folks full of carbs at these times, and none of it will get through the blood-brain barrier--no matter how high the blood sugar level is raised.

Instead of trying to find another miracle pill, or another miracle procedure, why not just administer coconut oil?  Coconut oil, even in the form of capsules, given three times daily, should bring about SOME kind of improvement unless the damage is extensive and permanent.

Why NOT administer coconut oil?  It would put large drug companies out of business, as well as group homes and institutions devoted to Alzheimer's patients.  Whoever thought so many people would be in such jeopardy from a coconut?

Then there's the "food professionals"--you know...the ones who are paid to tell us fats are bad, and to reinforce fat-phobia.  From the nutritionist/dietician on the ground all the way up to the master lobby, the A.N.D.--all those people would also be out of jobs, and together with the Alzheimer's leagues, would definitely throw our teetering economy over the brink into Depression territory, and all the power and influence gained since the last Depression would e forever lost.

This is how we take back control of our own destinies--GET FAT ADAPTED.  The sooner the better.

Celiac Disease--Soon There'll Be a Pill For That

To contact us Click HERE
From HealthDay News.  Give them enough time, and they'll have the cure for dying.  Instead of opting for the expensive pill just so you can eat bread products, why not just skip the whole thing and be kinder to your body?  Chances are this thing, like all other drugs, will have side effects--some nasty and worth suing over.

"For people with celiac disease, everyday foods such as bread, pizza crust and muffins are potential enemies. But scientists anticipate that some day a simple pill could help prevent the digestive upsets caused by ingesting the gluten in wheat, rye or barley products.

The only current treatment for celiac disease is a gluten-free diet. A new study, however, offers some potential for hope. Researchers have re-engineered a naturally occurring enzyme, kumamolisin-As, to break down gluten in the stomach into much smaller protein pieces, called peptides. They say these are less likely to trigger the autoimmune response that can create a wide range of painful and irritating symptoms.

The re-engineered enzyme, named KumaMax, appears to be highly effective, at least in a test tube. It dismantled more than 95 percent of a gluten peptide that is thought to cause celiac disease, according to the study, which was published recently in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.


Ideally, the team could develop the enzyme into a food additive such as the gas remedies Beano or Gas-X and offer it without a prescription, said lead study author Justin Siegel, assistant professor of chemistry and biochemistry at the University of California, Davis. But this could take a few years to develop. If the researchers opt to make a prescription drug, the process of clinical trials and obtaining U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval could take a decade or more, he said.

An enzyme is a protein that performs a chemical reaction. Proteins are the workhorses in every cell of every living thing, and their function is defined by their shape and structure.

In this case, the researchers re-engineered the natural enzyme to recognize the peptide that triggers celiac disease and modified the protein in the laboratory so it would survive the acidic stomach environment. "We did the engineering to change the genes and sent that into standard microorganisms to create the protein," Siegel said.

The next step is to show that the enzyme is not toxic and functions as designed in animals. "It shouldn't be toxic; it's just a protein you're eating," Siegel said. 


How effective might the enzyme be? "For some people, even flour in the air makes them stop breathing. Some are very sensitive, and in some it just upsets their stomach a little," Siegel said. "For those who are hypersensitive, this probably is not going to solve the problem, but it would allow them to go to dinner, and in case any gluten ended up in their meal, they wouldn't have to worry about it."

"For those less sensitive, they could pop one before each meal and eat anything they want," he added.


Larger size here
The process of identifying the precise trigger for a disease or condition and engineering a drug to circumvent the disease-causing process is part of what some call the personalized medicine revolution, Siegel said. "We can design a small molecule, a pill, that can be specific to an exact target and have few side effects, if any," he said. 

Some experts identified limitations to the research.

"This is the earliest phase, and you now have to show that it actually breaks down the gluten peptides that trigger a response in the stomach at a speed that will protect the human," said Dr. Joseph Murray, a professor of medicine in the division of gastroenterology and the department of immunology at the Mayo Clinic, in Rochester, Minn. "Let's see how it goes with a whole slice of bread."


Murray said that dismantling 95 percent of the protein component that is thought to trigger celiac disease may still not be enough to provide celiac patients protection. "It will probably be helpful to someone who gets a low-level exposure [to glutens] by accident," he said.

But celiac disease is a common problem, with about 2 million to 3 million Americans suffering from it. "People need alternatives, and this is an example of the scientific community taking novel approaches to helping people with celiac disease," Murray said."

After 30 Years, Ethanol's Federal Tax Credit Expires

To contact us Click HERE
Posted: Monday, April 23, 2012

For the last 30 years, The U.S. Federal government has been subsidizing the use of Ethanol, which is mostly produced from corn. Since the tax credits' expiration earlier this year, the issue of renewing the federal subsidy has been difficult for candidates seeking office throughout the Midwest. The Ethanol subsidy, "In the last year, when Congress was preoccupied with deficits and debt, became a symbol of corporate welfare."

Currently, almost 40% of the nation's corn crop contributes to the creation of Ethanol and related products, including animal feed. Over the last 30 years, more than $20 billion in subsidies have been provided to encourage the use of the product. Generally, proponents of the Ethanol tax break accepted the expiration of the tax credit without a big battle. However, Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa and a leading advocate for the Ethanol subsidy noted that Ethanol is used to reduced retail gasoline prices for America and reliance on foreign oil.

"The end of this giant subsidy is a win for taxpayers, the environment and people struggling to put food on the table" said Michal L. Rosenoer, a policy analyst from Friends of the Earth "Production of ethanol, with its use of pesticides and fertilizers and heavy industrial machinery, causes soil erosion and air and water pollution. And it means that less land is available for growing food, so food prices go up"

Representative Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, said; "with record deficits and a ballooning national debt, it was ludicrous to expect taxpayers to pay billions to prop up a mature industry that should be able to fend for itself."

Read the full article here: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/02/business/energy-environment/after-three-d
ecades-federal-tax-credit-for-ethanol-expires.html 

23 Şubat 2013 Cumartesi

Flagellants of Nocera Terinese - 1960's

To contact us Click HERE

Every seven years in the town of Nocera Terinese, Italy, a mysterious rite hundreds of years old still takes place to this day.
On Good Friday, Flagellants from the surrounding villages perform the ritual of the battenti.

In this tradition, the participants embed shards of glass in pieces of cork, then forcefully drive the makeshift scourges into their bare legs. Bleeding, they jog the route of the Easter procession, enduring the pain and suffering of religious sacrifice in the name of spiritual cleansing.

Music: Bela Lam & Family - Poor Little Benny (1920's field recording)

To contact us Click HERE

Virginia native Zanddervon Beliah Lamb, renamed Bela Lam by Okeh Records, performs the song Poor Little Benny with wife Rose Meadows.

With Bela’s brother-in-law Paul and son Alva, they became local favorites near the Blue Ridge Mountain region in the 1920’s, eventually being called to New York City to record six songs.

Influenced by the local religious music of the day, Bela Lam & the Greene County Singers, as they would come to be known, are notable for their shape-note harmonies, highly influential during the period

Amazon - Skeets McDonald music found
Amazon - The classic sound of Bakersfield, CA
Amazon - Add some Playboys, Cowboys, & Doughboys to your music collection

Century 21 Calling - Bell Labs promotional film for 1962 Seattle World's Fair

To contact us Click HERE

Occassionally, people do get the future right, as they seem to have done in this film, Century 21 Calling, made more than 45 years ago to promote Bell Labs at the 1962 Seattle World's Fair.

Call-waiting, call-forwarding, pagers, auto-dialing, news & weather info retrieval, central computer databases that log all of your private information (so that's where it came from).

Still waiting on that solar battery business, though.

Special mention goes out to the futuristic monorail opener (those never really did catch on, did they?), the perfectly kitsch soundtrack, and the climactic ending where the young couple shoot up the to the head of the Space Needle, as if they were bursting up and out into the future.

Is that Bill Murray singing in the background at the end?

You tell me ...

NOW OPEN: The NEW Weirdo Video BETA
Featuring the Lost Stanley Kubrick film
DAY OF THE FIGHT.

Now Available - Weirdo Video's Vamps & Vixens - High Quality DVD only 14.99 + S&H

Marijuana aka "Marihuana!" - 1930's

To contact us Click HERE


A trailer for a nudie film that masquerades as an anti-'marihuana' morality tale.

Watch wild & reckless youths lose their souls to the devil's weed.

NOW OPEN: The NEW Weirdo Video BETA
Featuring the Lost Stanley Kubrick film
DAY OF THE FIGHT.

Now Available - Weirdo Video's Vamps & Vixens - High Quality DVD only 14.99 + S&H

Amazon - The Gateway to DVD's about Ganja & Classics to catch fire to
Histories about & Studies of the Devil's Weed
Sexploitation films for the purely prurient

The Labor of Thy Hands - ca. mid-1950's

To contact us Click HERE

In this vintage promotional film produced by the Jewish women's group Hadassah, viewers are reminded of the need to develop a skilled workforce in the young state of Israel. Interesting footage of early kibbutzim and Israeli industry are highlighted in this film, with a stress on modernizing the economy and culture, the stress is on becoming an equal in a technologically advancing world.

NOW OPEN: The NEW Weirdo Video BETA
Featuring the Lost Stanley Kubrick film
DAY OF THE FIGHT.

22 Şubat 2013 Cuma

It's Groundhog Day!

To contact us Click HERE
Do NOT trust what the groundhog says, because it says something different for every region that has its own groundhog.  The more southerly groundhogs ("General Beauregard" comes to mind) are always going to predict an early spring due to their latitude.  More northern groundhogs (like "Punxatawny Phil") are always going to predict 6 more weeks of winter.

Regardless of what a groundhog's shadow says, THE CALENDAR NEVER LIES!  If the calendar says spring isn't coming for another month or two, then that's the final word.

Boomers' Health Fails To Measure Up to Parents'

To contact us Click HERE
From HealthDay News.  Gosh, I wonder why...could it be the proliferation of processed foods, convenience foods, foods drowned in a sea of chemicals and toxins, and fed whatever happens to be cheapest while confined to the point of strangulation?  We worked so hard to achieve this processed life, and look what it's doing to us!  THIS is progress?


"The baby boom is turning out to be a health bust.

Despite growing up at a time of great innovation in health care, the 78 million people born in the United States between 1946 and 1964 aren't looking all that healthy today, according to a new study.


Medical advances have led to the longest life expectancy ever, but U.S. baby boomers have higher rates of chronic disease, more disability and lower self-rated health than did their parents at a comparable age.

The research may surprise many baby boomers, who have embraced activities such as running, fitness classes and backpacking in unprecedented numbers.

"There seems to be somewhat of a disconnect between the reputation of baby boomers for being healthy and what we see in increasing rates of diabetes, high blood pressure and obesity," said study author Dr. Dana King, a professor of family medicine at West Virginia University School of Medicine. "It's really discouraging that they're not the healthiest generation."


The study, published as a research letter Feb. 4 in JAMA Internal Medicine, compared data on people aged 46 to 64 in two time periods -- from 1988 to 1994 for the older generation, and from 2007 to 2010 for the baby boomers.

While 32 percent of their parents' generation described their health as "excellent," only about 13 percent of baby boomers did so.

Obesity was more common among baby boomers than their parents (39 percent versus 29 percent). In addition, 52 percent of boomers said they had no regular physical activity, while only 17 percent in their parents' generation reported inactivity.


There was one area of good news, however. Boomers have lower rates of heart attack and emphysema, and are less likely to smoke cigarettes, the study reported. King noted that the reduction in smoking -- from 28 percent of the population to 21 percent -- shows the value of conducting a concerted public health campaign. He said the nation needs to focus the same amount of effort now on obesity to discover truly effective solutions.

The findings didn't surprise some experts.

"Obesity seems to be the underlying cause of many of the health issues baby boomers are facing," said Nancy Copperman, a registered dietitian and director of public health initiatives at North Shore-LIJ Health System, in Great Neck, N.Y. "I wasn't surprised to see the data because we've seen the obesity epidemic over the past two to three decades really increase, and with that heart disease, diabetes and high blood pressure." 

The study tapped data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Factors used to compare the two generations included health status, functional and work disability, healthy lifestyle characteristics, and presence of chronic disease.


The baby boomer generation had a higher percentage of people with high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes and obesity than did their parents' generation.

Disability was defined conservatively, said King. "To be considered disabled you had to be walking only with an assistance device, such as a cane, or only able to climb up 10 steps, have trouble stooping down, or walking a quarter of a mile," he explained. Again, boomers consistently had a higher level of disability than their parents' generation.

So what was the previous generation doing right? "There was a huge difference in their typical amount of exercise," said King. "Fifty percent were getting moderate physical activity 12 times a month, while just 35 percent of baby boomers got that much exercise." 


 
The research also showed that medication use for high blood pressure was higher among baby boomers, and prescription drug use for high cholesterol was 10 times greater among the younger generation than among the previous generation. Of course, many of the medications boomers take were not widely available when their parents were of similar age.


Do boomers rely too much on medications to solve their health issues? "I'm concerned that has a great deal to do with the problem," said King. "The drugs are supposed to be used in addition to a healthy lifestyle, not instead of it." 

Baby boomers are definitely moving less than their parents did, said Copperman. "Our parents didn't have the conveniences we have. Now, often both parents are working and spending less time doing manual labor. Instead of mowing the lawn or cleaning the house, they might hire someone to do it," she noted.

But King said it's still not too late for baby boomers to get healthier. He said his previous research showed that it is possible to "turn back the clock" even in one's 50s and 60s."

The study in question has not been released in print yet, and Mama ain't payin' for access to a sneak peek.

IRS Ruling to Create Millions of Uninsured in Wake of Obamacare

To contact us Click HERE
From Forbes.  Obamacare is slowly being bled dry by congressional raiding, and now this--this obviously was by design.  It's a promised magic carpet ride, but the rug is being pulled out from under you.  This was vote-buying at its worst!

"The devil is always in the details.

While many opponents of the Affordable Care Act have been busy stressing over the penalty they would be required to pay should they fail to purchase health insurance come 2014, it turns out that the IRS is clearing the way to reduce the number of Americans subject to the penalty—while making it near impossible for millions of people to afford suitable coverage for their families, subverting the very purpose of the law itself.

It begins with a poorly drafted provision in the healthcare reform law stating that individuals who receive their health insurance as a benefit of employment will be permitted to take a pass on their company policy and elect to buy their coverage on the health exchange—allowing them to take advantage of the federal healthcare subsidies available to low and middle income Americans—if their company provided health insurance policy is deemed ‘unaffordable’.

‘Unaffordable’ is defined as requiring the employee to pay more than 9.5% of the employee’s household income towards his or her employer provided healthcare benefit.


As an example, let’s take an employee who earns $35,000 a year. According to the IRS rule, if that employee is paying less than $3,325 a year towards their healthcare benefit, that employee will be required to stick with the company health insurance policy and would be barred from taking advantage of the federal subsidies available in the form of tax credits that the exchanges have to offer.

The Kaiser Family Foundation’s 2012 survey of what employees pay towards their employer provided healthcare benefit reveals that the average, individual employee made an annual contribution of $951 towards their health benefit. Thus, there would not appear to be much of a problem here.

But this is where it gets ugly…

The same Kaiser Family Foundation survey reveals that the average contribution of employees who are paying towards a family policy is $4316 a year—a number well in excess of the 9.5% of earnings for someone making just $35,000 a year.

Thus, we would expect that the employee and his family —or, at the least, the remainder of the employee’s family—would be free to head over to the health exchanges to get their insurance and benefit from the subsidies available to those in their earnings bracket, right?

Wrong.


We would be wrong because the Internal Revenue Service has ruled that only the portion of the contribution attributable to the individual employee is to be considered for purposes of determining what is affordable—not the entire contribution an employee with a family pays for family coverage.
Thus, using the example of our employee who is the sole breadwinner in the family and earns $35,000 a year, so long as the contribution directly attributed to his own health coverage is less than $3,325 a year, nobody in the family qualifies for participation on the healthcare exchanges and nobody can qualify for the intended government subsidies.

Using the Kaiser averages, the family in our example will end up paying over 12 percent of their annual income for health insurance—a crushing amount of money for a family earning just $35,000 a year and well beyond what is affordable for many.

The result will be millions of spouses and children left to go uninsured.


How can this possibly make sense when the very purpose of the healthcare reform law is to get more Americans insured rather than less?

Says Jocelyn Guyer of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University, “We can see kids falling through the cracks. They will lack access to affordable employer-based family coverage and still be locked out of tax credits to help them buy coverage for their kids in the marketplaces, or exchanges, being established in every state.”

So absurd is this ruling—given the intent and purpose of the Affordable Care Act—Congress will have no choice but to correct the offending passage and set this straight, yes?  I wouldn’t hold your breath.


With a GOP controlled House dead set on doing anything in its power to disrupt Obamacare—even if it means leaving millions of children uninsured—it is highly unlikely that they will do what is necessary to correct this problem.

For those who are quick to enjoy so negative a result of what they perceive to be a poorly crafted and ill conceived health care reform law, they should understand that virtually all legislation—even legislation that meets the approval of the staunchest healthcare reform critic—comes complete with drafting errors and ambiguities. However, in normal circumstances, either the courts or Congress can typically be depended upon to straighten out such ambiguities in order to support the intent and purposes of any given law.

Sadly, ‘normal circumstances’ do not apply when it comes to Obamacare as the law’s enemies will be more than happy to deny health care coverage to millions of American children in order to press what they will perceive as a political advantage.


It should also not go unnoticed that there are no shortage of experts who believe that the IRS has misinterpreted the provision and made a credible case to support the notion that Congress intended the 9.5% cut-off to apply to the total family benefit—not just the individual employee benefit.

I suppose there is some good news.

In a separate regulation proposed by the IRS, the spouse and children of the employee used in the example provided above would be exempt from any penalty resulting from not having health insurance coverage as the cost to the family under the employee’s work benefit would exceed 8 percent of the household income.

I’m sure that will come as very cold comfort indeed should that family’s child fall ill.


Mistakes happen. Ambiguity in legislation is a normal, everyday occurrence.

However, failure of this Congress to repair this issue would be anything but normal and a truly shameful example of how politicians will sacrifice anyone who gets in the way of a convenient political narrative.

Nobody should sit idly by and allow this perversion of the Affordable Care Act to happen."

No--we should all begin to see Uncle Sam isn't interested in anything but our money, and Congress isn't interested in anything beyond our vote, so we have to start taking better care of ourselves FOR ourselves!  It starts at home, and the first step is renovating what goes into the shopping cart...but who do you listen to when the nationally certified nutrition professionals are backed by processed food and junk food?  This is where you have to do the hard work of researching to develop ideas, then do your own trial-and-error work to see what works for you, and what doesn't, but most of us would rather sit back and wait for the Cliff's Notes version.  But which version is the RIGHT one?

Again, more work than the average person wants to get involved in, just to know what to eat and how to exercise. Well, it looks like they really have no choice now if they want to stay alive and healthy.

Just as Uncle Sam is looking at raising the Social Security age, and trimming Medicare benefits to pare back the expenses of the New Deal, he's also busy containing costs of the *new* New Deal.  The simplest explanation is we can't afford this program, and never could, but erecting it got more votes for the party that designed it.  It was never truly meant to help anyone but the Democrats...and they already have their health care insurance!

Number of Americans With Alzheimer's May Triple By 2050

To contact us Click HERE
From HealthDay News.  With the proliferation into better eating and carb control, I'm thinking not.  Besides, the majority of Boomers will already be dead.


"The number of Americans afflicted with Alzheimer's disease could triple within the next 40 years if no progress is made against the disease, new projections show.

Reporting in the Feb. 6 online issue of the journal Neurology, researchers say that by 2050, nearly 14 million Americans could have Alzheimer's -- the most common form of dementia. That's close to triple the prevalence in 2010, when an estimated 4.7 million U.S. adults had the memory-robbing disease.


The new prediction is an update of a report published a decade ago -- which also projected a near-tripling in Alzheimer's disease in the next few decades.

So, not much has changed. "This is where we're headed if we don't make any progress in Alzheimer's research," said researcher Jennifer Weuve, an assistant professor at the Rush Institute for Healthy Aging in Chicago.

Unfortunately, she added, research into treating and delaying the disease has so far been "frustrating."

There are several drugs approved in the United States for slowing memory loss and other Alzheimer's symptoms -- brands like Aricept and Namenda. The medications work by affecting chemical messengers in the brain. But for many people, they either do not help or only work for a limited time.

Then there are the experimental "anti-amyloid" drugs, which target a protein that builds up and forms so-called plaques in the brains of people with Alzheimer's. But in studies so far, the medications have failed to help when given to people who already have moderate dementia symptoms.

Now, the hope is that they might work if given earlier in the game.

Research in the next several years could be pivotal, said Dr. P. Murali Doraiswamy, a psychiatry professor at Duke University Medical Center and an author of the book "The Alzheimer's Action Plan."


Three major clinical trials are starting this year, all looking at prevention in some way, Doraiswamy said. Two are testing drug treatment for people with gene mutations that cause inherited, early-onset Alzheimer's; the other involves older adults who have no dementia symptoms but do have amyloid deposits in their brains.

All of those studies are looking at anti-amyloid drugs.

Doraiswamy said that the risk is that researchers are "putting all their eggs in one basket" by focusing on amyloid-clearing drugs. The theory is that amyloid plaques are the root cause of dementia symptoms in Alzheimer's, but that's not a certainty.

Some other, smaller studies are testing other approaches, though, Doraiswamy said. One such trial is looking at whether supervised exercise can ward off or delay dementia in older adults with mild cognitive [mental] impairment -- less serious problems with memory and thinking that can eventually progress to Alzheimer's.

"If some of these trials succeed, we may be able to make a significant difference in the future prevalence of Alzheimer's," Doraiswamy said. "If they don't, we'll be back to the drawing board."

The latest findings are based on a long-term study of 10,800 older adults from Chicago who were evaluated for dementia; over 13 years, 402 were diagnosed with Alzheimer's. Weuve's team used U.S. Census data to extrapolate the findings to the whole population.

They estimate that, barring major research advances, 13.8 million Americans will have Alzheimer's in 2050 -- including 7 million people aged 85 or older.


It's thought that the brain damage in Alzheimer's begins a decade or more before symptoms emerge. There's also some evidence that the same risk factors for heart disease -- such as high blood pressure and diabetes -- might also be linked to Alzheimer's risk.

So, prevention may need to start early. "If we're going to make progress, we will probably have to focus on mid-life," Weuve said.

No one is sure, however, what the average person can do to prevent or delay Alzheimer's disease. A number of studies have linked certain lifestyle habits -- regular exercise, a healthy diet and staying mentally active -- to a lowered Alzheimer's risk. But it's not clear that those habits are the reason for the reduced risk.

"Right now, there is no magic bullet," Doraiswamy said. "But I would still encourage people to get regular exercise, to not smoke, to follow a healthy diet, like the Mediterranean diet." That diet is rich in fish, vegetables and fruit, whole grains and olive oil -- a source of "good" unsaturated fat.


According to the Alzheimer's Association, the United States spent about $200 billion in direct treatment costs for Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia in 2012. If no progress is made, that figure will top $1 trillion in 2050.

The good news is that there is now a national focus on Alzheimer's, said Maria Carrillo, vice president of medical and scientific relations for the Alzheimer's Association.

Last year, the Obama administration announced the creation of the National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease, which included funds for research, health care provider training and family caregiver support. It set a goal of finding effective treatment and prevention approaches by 2025.

"We're very hopeful," Carrillo said. But, she added, there needs to be continued "pressure" on government so that Alzheimer's is not forgotten. "This is an under-addressed crisis in the U.S.," she noted.

To help advance research, people with Alzheimer's and their families could also consider participating in clinical trials, Carrillo noted. "Many people don't even know that there are clinical trials, and that they're recruiting," she said."

At the risk of becoming a math extrapolation, it would be nice for someone to take low-carb eaters and test them, but alas--they probably have great trouble finding any "older adults", certainly ENOUGH older adults, who are low-carb eaters, to make a study with.  If they're sincerely interested in catching this thing early like they say, they'd be wise to drop down to the 40-50 year cohort, and seek out those who are fat-adapted.

I read an interesting book called The Brain Trust Program while in my search for information on what actually happens during a hot flash.  This book was written by an actual neurologist, so he knows a little something about Alzheimer's and how to prevent it. He's not some bean counter paid to extrapolate numbers in order to scare us into eating right and caring about ourselves.  He's not a headline-grabber.

This guy actually had a single solution for hot flashes, epilepsy, AND Alzheimer's:  get fat adapted!  He even explains why, and I've shared the explanation with you in my Menopause Musings--carbs broken down into sugars no longer reach the brain, and the brain must then rely on ketones for energy.  So much for the idea of Type 3 diabetes!  So much for the idea of the brain being flooded with sugar and becoming insulin resistant!  The brain is actually being starved to death, and is forced to eat itself looking for energy.

In children and young adults, this brain sugar shortage due to faulty sugar/hormone shuttles manifests itself as epilepsy.  In midlife, it shows up as hot flashes.  In old age, it appears as Alzheimer's.  These are signs of carb super-sensitivity that are going ignored by much of the populace--the kids may be getting the most beneficial treatment of all the cases of carb super-sensitivty.


We can stuff these folks full of carbs at these times, and none of it will get through the blood-brain barrier--no matter how high the blood sugar level is raised.

Instead of trying to find another miracle pill, or another miracle procedure, why not just administer coconut oil?  Coconut oil, even in the form of capsules, given three times daily, should bring about SOME kind of improvement unless the damage is extensive and permanent.

Why NOT administer coconut oil?  It would put large drug companies out of business, as well as group homes and institutions devoted to Alzheimer's patients.  Whoever thought so many people would be in such jeopardy from a coconut?

Then there's the "food professionals"--you know...the ones who are paid to tell us fats are bad, and to reinforce fat-phobia.  From the nutritionist/dietician on the ground all the way up to the master lobby, the A.N.D.--all those people would also be out of jobs, and together with the Alzheimer's leagues, would definitely throw our teetering economy over the brink into Depression territory, and all the power and influence gained since the last Depression would e forever lost.

This is how we take back control of our own destinies--GET FAT ADAPTED.  The sooner the better.